Feb. 3rd, 2011

pictor: (Default)
There is something about the latest CRTC ruling that is escaping me. It amounts to (simplified) rates would charge a specific base rate, and then a rate/GB of traffic.

Broadly speaking...that's just a rewording of what already happens. I pay a rate of $X and I get a limit of YGB, and beyond that I pay a rate of $Z per GB. They may be talking about changing X, Y, and Z, but how is the new ruling any different in a real sense than what we had previously?

To be sure, I want X, Y, and Z to be set to fair and competitive values, and of course I would like X and Z to be low, and Y to be high, but the exact numbers is just semantics. I am not sure what the ruling actually changes in terms of the mechanical approach to ISP billing.

More to the point...it's a pretty logical model. I'd like to pay a low rate for what I use, but ultimately, it makes sense that I pay for what I use. The whole furor lately came about in no small part from Netflix coming to Canada, but again, I don't see what that changes. If I use Netflix a lot, then my bandwidth goes up. If I go past my plan limit, then I pay for the overage. I may argue about the specific rates I am being charged, but I can't argue with the principle of having a limit, and of having to pay if I go over the limit.

I am missing something in these recent happenings. The articles in question seemed to surround plans with unlimited access...but I have never heard of such a beast. Every internet plan I have seen, from every provider I have seen, has had specific limits. Sometimes those limits are very high, sometimes low, but I've never seen unlimited. Maybe other parts of Canada have unlimited plans.

July 2011

3456 789

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2017 06:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios