(no subject)
Oct. 9th, 2008 10:54 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Newsweek is in trouble. A republican media team is up in arms that Newsweek featured a photo of Sarah Palin on the cover that was, wait for it, NOT photoshopped. How dare they, how dare they publish a picture without editing the photo to disguise blemishes and wrinkles.

Personally, I think it's not a bad picture. She looks like a real person at least.

Personally, I think it's not a bad picture. She looks like a real person at least.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 04:36 pm (UTC)Here you go. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 04:57 pm (UTC)Gods help us. I hope those in the US who don't ascribe to this kind of ideology still have a chance to get out.
*end of snark*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 06:44 pm (UTC)Not that I'd ever confuse you on MSN or anything.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 06:20 pm (UTC)I think this sets out their problem much more accurately.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 11:11 pm (UTC)Particularly from the US news media I read, the campaign has been trying to bash Obama for his shady past, this photo immediately strikes me as not genuine, almost like putting on a front.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 04:11 pm (UTC)Isn't most media a little elitist, and a little liberal? Don't most daily papers edit for an eighth grade education? What's the big deal with this one?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-10 05:28 pm (UTC)